====================================================== Mukhia Jaipal Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 4 26-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Although learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me about innocence of the petitioner by arguing that no specific overt-act has been attributed against the petitioner and so far as criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, almost all the cases have been lodged at the instance of Manik Chand but I am not at all convinced because in course of investigation, witnesses, specifically, stated that the petitioner had committed murder of one of the deceased of this case and, therefore, prayer for bail in connection with Raghopur (Rustampur O.P) P.S. Case no. 33/2011 arising out of Sessions trial no. 143/2012 pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge II, Vaishali at Hajipur is again rejected on the ground mentioned in my previous order dated 22.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 31513/2011.