Petitioner in a civil revision filed an application for permission to withdraw the application for enhanced rent.
The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.R. No.31 of 2012 (2) dt.03-10-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.31 of 2012
====================================================== Sri Subodh Kumar Pal S/O Sri Ram Prasad Mandal Proprietor Of University Shoe, Sumrit Mandal Complex R/O Central Jail Road, Tilkamajhi, P.S. Tilkamanjhi, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner Versus Bimal Kumar Mandal S/O Late Sumrit Mandal R/O Mohalla - Tilamanjhi, P.S. Barari, District - Bhagalpur .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 02. 03-10-2012 Mr. Bimlendu Mishra for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Narain, learned Senior Counsel for the sole opposite party are present.
Mr. Bimlendu Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument seeks permission to withdraw this application, for approaching the landlord-opposite party with a request to allow him to continue in the demised premises as the petitioner would be agreeable to payment of enhanced rent. The petitioner is always at liberty to do so and does not require any permission from this Court.
As prayed, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
S.Sb/-
Sri Subodh Kumar Pal
Bimal Kumar Mandal
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
