Disposed

Smt.Sugapati Devi v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 Apr 2011CWJC/1939/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to expedite a writ matter pending with the Appellate Tribunal. Court disposed the writ application directing the Tribunal to decide the matter expeditiously within four months, including hearing the intervener.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the matter finally within four months by a reasoned order after hearing all concerned parties.

Smt.Sugapati Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2011)

¶1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
 CWJC No.1939 of 2010

¶2

1. SMT.SUGAPATI DEVI W/O ARJUN SINGH YADAV AT PRESENT ELECTED
MUKHIYA PIROO PANCHAYAT, POLICE STATION, HASPURA, DIST-
AURANGABAD, BIHAR

¶3

 Versus

¶4

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSION-CUM-SECRETARY, HUMAN
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA

¶5

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD

¶6

3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, AURANGABAD, BIHAR

¶7

4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, HASPURA BLOCK, AURANGABAD

¶8

5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFIER HASPURA BLOCK AURANGABAD

¶9

6. PIROO PANCHAYAT THROUGH PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, HASPURA, AURANGABAD

¶10

7. PINKI KUMARI D/O RAMASHISH SINGH PANCHAYAT SIKSHA MITRA, GOVT.
PRIMARY SCHOOL MAHADIPUR, PANCHAYT PIROO, HASPURA, AURANGABAD,
PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF VILL-GAWASPUR, PO- PIERO, P.S- HASPURA,
DISTT- AURANGABAD

¶11

8. THE CHAIRMAN APPELLATE AUTHORITY PANCHAYAT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT
AURANGABAD DITT- AURANGABAD

¶12

 -----------

¶13

2/ 15/04/2011 Learned counsel for the State files a supplementary counter affidavit serving a copy on the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the proceedings.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ application the Appellate Tribunal has taken seisin of the matter and has issued notice to the petitioner vis-à-vis the appointment of Respondent No.7.

¶15

The limited submission now is for direction to the Appellate Tribunal to decide the matter expeditiously.

¶16

The writ application is disposed with the observation that let the Appellate Tribunal dispose off

¶17

¶18

the matter finally by a reasoned and speaking order after hearing all concerned including Respondent No.7 within a maximum period of four months from the date

¶19

of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶20

The writ application stands disposed.

¶21

¶22

( Navin Sinha, J.)

Smt.Sugapati Devi v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Sugapati Devi v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mamta Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sukhdeo Rai Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

Geeta Devi Vs the Bihar State Election Commi

Sindhu Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Smt.Renuka Bharti Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

M/S Mars Mountain Security Ser Vs the Union of India and Ors.