Iswar Sahu v. Utkal Grameen Bank, Bargarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; challenge to DRT Cuttack judgment dated 16.09.2020 in O.A. No. 1 of 2017 (Annexure-2) and to execution proceeding R.C. No. 293 of 2020 not adjudicated; liberty effectively to seek review under Section 22(2)(e) of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993; Petitioners: Iswar Sahu and another (counsel Jaqulin Jena); Opposite Party: Utkal Grameen Bank (counsel Asutosh Panda); Coram: Justice K.R. Mohapatra and Justice S.K. Mishra; order dated 02.04.2025.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the writ petition permitted to enable the Petitioners to avail the remedy of review under Section 22(2)(e) of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993; any such review application filed along with interim application to be considered in accordance with law; urgent certified copy of the order to be granted on proper application.