Dismissed¶32

Gopinath Dalei @ Dalai v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC18 Feb 2025WP(C)/20771/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Orissa High Court, Cuttack; W.P.(C) No. 20771 of 2022; Gopinath Dalei @ Dalai vs State of Odisha and others; decided 18.02.2025 by K.R. Mohapatra and S.K. Mishra, JJ.; writ petition seeking quashing of order dated 3.7.2019 (Annexure-7) and regularization of service as Junior Assistant (Banking Assistant); dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated absence of petitioner's counsel (6.2.2025 and 18.2.2025); no costs, no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

The Court concluded that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the writ petition, as learned counsel for the petitioner was absent on the last date (6th February, 2025) and again at the time of call. ¶31

Gopinath Dalei @ Dalai Vs State of Orissa — Orissa HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Signature Not Verified

¶2

Digitally Signed Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA CU TTACK Date: 19-Feb-2025 16:08:52

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶4

W.P.(C) No. 20771 OF 2022

¶5

Gopinath Dalei @ Dalai

…. Petitioner

None

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

¶10

…. Opp. Parties

¶11

Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel (For Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2)

¶12

Mr. Baidhar Sahoo, Advocate (For Opposite Party Nos.3 and 4)

¶13

CORAM:

¶14

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

ORDER

Order No.

18.02.2025

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶20

None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.

¶21

Mr. Mishra, learned ASC and Mr. Sahoo, learned

¶22

counsel for Opposite Party Nos.3 and 4 are present.

¶23

Petitioner in this writ petition prays for the following

¶24

reliefs:-

¶25

“The Petitioner therefore prays that in the facts and circumstances stated above this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit the writ petition, issue notice to the Opposite parties, call for the records from the opposite parties if necessary and after hearing the parties to this writ petition, this Hon’ble Court may be graciously be pleased to issue appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ quashing the order dtd.3.7.2019 under annexure no.7 and regularizing the service of the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant (Banking Assistant).

¶26

And or pass any other order/order, direction/directions as may be deemed just & proper in favour of the petitioner.

¶27

Page 1 of 2

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

Digitally Signed Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA CU TTACK Date: 19-Feb-2025 16:08:52

¶30

And for which kind act the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pay.”

¶31

Order sheets of the writ petition reveal that learned counsel for the Petitioner was absent on the last date, i.e., 6^th February, 2025. Hence, this Court feels that the Petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ petition.

¶32

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶33

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

¶34

s.s.satapathy

¶35

(S.K. Mishra) Judge

¶36

Page 2 of 2

Gopinath Dalei @ Dalai v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopinath Dalei @ Dalai v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dillip Kumar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

M/S Merica Agro Products Pvt. Ltd., Bbsr Vs Bank of Baroda, Ganganagar Branch, Bbsr

Osrtc Vs Purna Chandra Patnaik

M/S. Meher Agencies, Cuttack Vs State of Odisha

Rashmita Behera Vs State of Odisha

Shaikh Sitarullah Vs State Bank of India, Bbsr