Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted and the opposing counsel did not dispute that the matter had become infructuous; the High Court ordered its disposal without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.19886 of 2022
DEEPAK PATRA …. Petitioner Represented by Adv.Mr. S. Roy, Adv. -versus- KENDRIYA …. Opposite Parties VIDYALAYA Represented by Adv.- SANGATHAN CUM Mr. H. Tripathy, Adv. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, NEW DELHI & ORS.
CORAM:
JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
ORDER
17.10.2025
Order No. 08. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits learned Panel Counsel appearing for the answering OPs does not dispute that the matter having become infructuous, needs to be disposed off as such. Ordered accordingly and writ petition is disposed off.
(Dixit Krishna Shripad) Judge
Prasant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 17-Oct-2025 17:51:33
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition, having become infructuous, should be disposed of accordingly?
Deepak Patra
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Cum Ministry of Education, New Delhi & Ors.
Dixit Krishna Shripad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
