Petitioner sought direction to enhance compensation for acquired land in Mouza Kalla, Deogarh, alleging inaction on his Section 3(G)(5) National Highway Act application. With the State doubting receipt of the application, counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 23-Jul-2025 10:54:32
WP(C) No.19168 of 2025
Himadri Behera …. Petitioner
Mr. Purna Chandra Mishra, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. Manmaya Kumar Dash, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
21.07.2025
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed on record to show that the application under Section 3(G)(5) of Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURTthe Ac t stated to have been filed has been received by the Date: 23-Jul-2025 10:54:32 Authority/Arbitrator. Hence, the writ petition filed by the Petitioner should not be entertained.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
RKS
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Himadri Behera
State of Odisha and others
K.R. Mohapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
