Employee challenged a transfer order in writ petition; since his removal from service was separately under challenge in a connected writ petition, he sought and obtained withdrawal. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18223 of 2018
Rabindranath Padhy
Petitioner
Proxy counsel on behalf of Mr. B. Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
Indian Overseas Bank, BBSR and Another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. M.B.K. Rao, Adv. for O.P. Nos.1 and 2
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
10.11.2025
11. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Since the petitioner during pendency of the Writ Petition was removed from his services and the same is under challenge in the connected W.P.(C) No.36467 of 2022 and an order of transfer is under challenge in the present Writ Petition, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present Writ Petition.
4. The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Signature Not Verified
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV SWAINBasudev Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 14-Nov-2025 12:06:07
Rabindranath Padhy
Indian Overseas Bank, BBSR
Another
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
