Bibudhendu Patnaik v. Collector,Dhenkanal
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition listed for mention; heard counsel for both parties and hearing concluded with judgment reserved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11768 of 2004
Binod Bhaban Club
..... Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
The Collector, Dhenkanal ..... Opposite Parties & Anr. Mr. Debasish Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER
10.03.2025
W.P.(C) No.11768 of 2004 and W.P.(C) No.11792 of 2004
1 . This Writ Petition is listed today under the heading “ To Be Mentioned ” and taken up through hybrid mode.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Binod Bhaban Club
- respondent
The Collector, Dhenkanal
Coram
S.K. Panigrahi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court