Writ petition disposed of after counsel submitted that the petitioner would approach the Appeal Committee under Rule 10 of the Rules of the Orissa High Court, 1948 for redressal of his grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 17206 of 2025
Aditya Mohan Bag …. Petitioner
Represented By Adv. – Mrs. J. Kaur, Advocate
-versus-
The District Judge, Jharsuguda and …. another
Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. – Mr. Subha Bikash Panda, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
ORDER
03.09.2025
(Hybrid Mode)
Order No.
02. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the earlier order dated 18.08.2025. She submits that the petitioner shall approach the Appeal Committee for redressal of his grievance as available under the Rule-10 of the Rules of the Orissa High Court, 1948.
2. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Signature Not Verified Judge Digitally Signed
Digitally Signed Signed by: AJIT KUMAR DUTTA Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 03-Sep-2025 18:40:27 dutta
Page 1 of 1
Aditya Mohan Bag
The District Judge, Jharsuguda
Manash Ranjan Pathak
Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
