Husband sought transfer of a Section 125 maintenance proceeding from Dhenkanal Family Court to Puri. The underlying proceeding was already decided by the transferor court, so the transfer petition was permitted to be withdrawn as infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK TRPCRL No.121 of 2024
Debasis Patra
…. Petitioner
Mr. Gopinath Mishra, Adovcate
-versus-
Rachana Pothal
…. Opposite Party
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
03.
ORDER 04.04.2025
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
Page 1 of 2
Suchitra
with the photocopy of the certified copy of the aforesaid judgment dated 12.02.2025.
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUCHITRA BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CU TTA CK Date: 04-Apr-2025 13:19:49
Page 2 of 2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Debasis Patra
Rachana Pothal
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
