Sasmita Maharana v. Rajendra Maharana
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer petition TRP(C) No.52 of 2025, Orissa High Court, Cuttack, decided 05.03.2025, Justice Murahari Sri Raman; Section 24 Code of Civil Procedure 1908; transfer of MAT Case No.5 of 2025 from Senior Civil Judge, Aska to Family Court, Cuttack; grounds of travel of more than 200 K.M. and absence of independent income of petitioner-wife Sasmita Maharana against respondent Rajendra Maharana; transfer declined and petition dismissed; liberty to appear through virtual mode; no insistence on personal attendance unless absolutely necessary; advocate Pratap Kumar Nayak.
What did the court decide?
None; the transfer was declined. However, the petitioner was left at liberty to seek permission to appear through virtual mode before the Court concerned, which shall not insist upon her personal attendance unless absolutely necessary; Registry was instructed to communicate the order to the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Aska forthwith.