Procedural order allowing an interlocutory application to convert the mislabelled MAT appeal into a writ petition (C), per the Stamp Report, with liberty to amend in the Registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No.328 OF 2025
Pradosh Kumar Rout
…. Appellant
Represented By Adv. – Mr. S. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Twinkle Biswal
…. Respondent
Represented By Adv. –
CORAM:
JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
ORDER
10.09.2025 (Hybrid Mode)
Order No. 01.
I.A. No.466 of 2025
1. I.A. has been filed for conversion of the nomenclature in terms of the Stamp Report dated 24.07.2025 which at paragraph9 indicates “nomenclature not correct, it may be register as W.P.C.”
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, I.A. is favoured and disposed of. Prayer for conversion of the petition to the W.P. (C) is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall have the liberty to carry out the necessary corrections/amendments in the Registry of the Court.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEE Reason: Authentication (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Location: OHCDate: 12-Sep-2025 17:28:03 Jyostna Judge
Page 1 of 1
Pradosh Kumar Rout
Twinkle Biswal
Manash Ranjan Pathak
Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
