Kalia @ Mrutunjaya Vs State

S.S. Mishra, J. The present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant assailing the judgment and order dated 10.12.2002 passed by the learned 1^st Addl. Sessions Judge, Puri in S.T. Case No.

¶14

20/92 of 2001. By the said judgment, the learned trial court convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

¶15

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 27.02.1998 at about

¶16

5:00 P.M., the informant’s father, Bhima Das, and her brother, Kalia

¶17

Das, were working in their land. As it suddenly started raining, the informant, Bisika Das, proceeded to the spot to provide them with an umbrella and pakhia . While returning to the village, the accused allegedly obstructed her in the land locally known as “Naapa Chak”, expressed his desire to have sexual intercourse with her, caught hold of her and attempted to drag her. Since the place was secluded, the informant, out of fear, raised an alarm. Hearing her cries, her uncle, Nakula Das, arrived at the spot, upon which the accused fled away. The informant belongs to the ‘Harijan’ community, whereas the accused is from the ‘Sabarna’ category.

¶18

On the same day, the informant orally reported the incident before the O.I.C., Kanas Police Station, who reduced the information into writing, registered the case and directed the A.S.I. Ananda Swain (P.W.6) to take up investigation. In course of investigation, P.W.6 visited the spot, examined the witnesses, arrested the accused and forwarded him to Court. Upon completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was submitted on 15.10.1998.

¶19

Page 2 of 10

¶20

3. On the basis of the materials available on record, charges were framed against the accused-appellant. Upon his plea of complete denial and claim for trial, he was accordingly put to trial. The accused was charged under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code for assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty, read with Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging commission of the offence on a member of the Scheduled Caste community on account of her caste identity.

¶21

4. To prove the case against the accused-appellant, the prosecution has examined six witnesses, while none has been adduced on behalf of the defence. Among the prosecution witnesses, P.W.3 is the informant and victim, whereas P.Ws.1, 2 and 4 are her father, brother and uncle respectively. P.W.5 was an independent witness, and P.W.6 was the A.S.I. of Police who undertook and completed the investigation in the case.

¶22

5. The learned trial court after analysing the entire evidence on record individually accorded the finding of guilt of the accused persons and passed a very detailed and extensive judgment.

¶23

Page 3 of 10

¶24

Paragraphs-7 and 8, of the impugned judgment will give a clear idea as to how the learned trial court has appreciated the evidence to nail the guilt of the accused-appellant, which is reproduced herein below for the convenience of ready reference:-

¶25

“7. Now coming to the evidence so far offence - u/s.354 of the I.P.C. is concerned, the informant Bisika Das(P.W.3) has categorically stated that she had gone to provide umbrella (Pakhia) to her father and brother, who were working in their land, as it was raining and while she was returning to the village the accused caught hold of her at ‘Naapa’ chak and started dragging her expressing his desire for sexual intercourse for which she shouted, and hearing the same, his uncle Nakula Das rushed to the spot and seeing him the accused fled away. She has further stated that her father and brother also soon thereafter came to the spot and she narrated this incident to her father, brother and uncle after which they returned to the village. She has also stated that due to the aforesaid act of the accused she got ashamed since it was touching her chastity. On the same day she orally reported the matter before the police, who reduced the same to writing and read over and explained the contents after which she signed on the FIR/Ext.1. P.W.-4 is the uncle of the informant. He has stated that he had gone to his land and was returning to the village since it started raining and hearing the shout of PW-3 from the spot, he went there and heard from her that the accused forcibly caught hold of her and expressed his desire for sexual intercourse. He has further stated that soon after P.Ws.1 and 2, who are the father and brother of the informant also came to the spot and they all returned to the village. P.Ws.1 and 2 have also stated that they were stacking the uprooted ground-nut in their land and as it started raning, P.W.3 had come to provide umbrella (Pakhia) to them and was returning to the village. They have further stated that soon thereafter they heard the shout of P.W.3 from the spot for which they rushed there and found P.W.3 crying. On their querry, P.W.3 informed that the accused caught hold of her and dragged and also attempted to rape her. P.W.5 is an

¶26

Page 4 of 10

¶27

independent witness, who has stated that he had gone to attend call of nature to ‘Naapa’ chak land and hearing the shout of P.W.3 went there and found her crying. He has also stated that on his querry, P.W.3 informed him that the accused caught hold of her expressing his desire for sexual intercourse. The evidence of P.Ws.1 and 5 is virtually not shakened in material particulars from their crossexamination. Thus, the F.I.R. version that while the informant Bisika Das was returning to the village the accused caught hold of her and dragged expressing his desire for sexual intercourse, is fully corroborated by the informant (P.W.3) herself, her father, brother and uncle (P.Ws.1,2 and 4) and the independent witness (P.W.5). The act of the accused in dragging the informant by force expressing his desire for sexual intercourse clearly amounts to the out-raging of modesty of P.W.3, attracting the offence u/s.354 of the I.P.C.

¶28

8. Prosecution thus has fully established its case u/s.354 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused. Hence the accused is held guilty of the offence u/s.354 of the I.P.C. and is convicted thereunder.”

¶29

6. Basing upon the above findings, the learned 1st Additional

¶30

Sessions Judge, Puri, in S.T. Case No. 20/92 of 2001, after an elaborate and meticulous appreciation of the evidence on record, recorded a clear finding of guilt against the accused. Though the appellant had been charged under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (P.A.) Act, the learned trial court did not find the ingredients of the offence under the SC/ST Act to be established and, accordingly, did not convict him under that

¶31

provision. Instead, the learned trial court held the appellant guilty solely for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian

¶32

Page 5 of 10

¶33

Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. The present Criminal Appeal has been preferred challenging the aforesaid judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.12.2002.

¶34

7. Heard Mr. Karunakar Gaya, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Sarada Prasad Dash, Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat, learned AGA for the State.

¶35

8. Albeit, Mr. Gaya, learned Counsel for the appellant, has strenuously argued the case on merits and taken this Court through the evidence available on record. However, after addressing the Court at some length, he fairly submitted that, having regard to the protracted judicial process that the appellant has undergone and the ordeal of trial faced by him, he confined his submissions to the quantum of sentence instead of further challenging the conviction.

¶36

It is submitted that the incident in question took place in the year 1998, and since then the appellant has been facing the ordeal of criminal prosecution for more than twenty-five years, including the period of trial and pendency of the present appeal. It is further submitted that the accused-appellant who was 24 years then is now in

¶37

Page 6 of 10

¶38

his mid-fifties and therefore, much has changed on the ground within this two and half decades.

¶39

The learned Counsel further submitted that, considering his age, the long lapse of time since the occurrence, and the prolonged pendency of the matter, sending the appellant to serve out the remaining custody period at this belated stage would serve no useful purpose. It is further submitted that the appellant has clean antecedents, with no other criminal case, similar or otherwise, pending or reported against him. Over the years, he has lived peacefully, well integrated into society, and is presently leading stable family life. Incarcerating him at this distant point of time, it was urged, would not advance the purpose of justice but rather cause unnecessary hardship to aged individuals and their families. It is also submitted that he has undergone 3 days in custody.

¶40

In view of these circumstances, learned Counsel prayed that the appellant be extended the benefit of Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and/or the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering the nature of the offences, the long passage of time, and his personal circumstances.

¶41

Page 7 of 10

¶42

9. Upon thoughtful consideration of the submissions made and

¶43

after perusal of the record, it is apparent that the occurrence took place over two and half decades ago. The appellant has already faced the strain and stigma of criminal proceedings for a considerable length of time and has also been in custody for 3 days. He has no previous criminal antecedents and is reported to have maintained peaceful conduct ever since. Having regard to his advanced age, clean background, and the long lapse of time since the incident, I am of the considered view that this is a fit case for extending the benefit of probation to the appellant.

¶44

Reliance is placed on the Judgement of Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab¹ , wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the object of the Probation of Offenders Act is to reform the individual offender and to prevent the conversion of a youthful or first-time offender into a habitual criminal by subjecting him to prison life. It was held thus: -

¶45

“The Act is a milestone in the progress of the modern liberal trend of reform in the field of penology. It is the result of the recognition of the doctrine that the object of criminal law is more to reform the individual offender than to punish him. Broadly stated, the Act distinguishes offenders below 21 years of age and those above that age,

¶46

1 AIR 1965 SC 444

¶47

Page 8 of 10

¶48

and offenders who are guilty of having committed an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life and those who are guilty of a lesser offence. While in the case of offenders who are above the age of 21 years absolute di sc retion is given to the court to release them after admonition or on probation of good conduct, subject to the conditions laid down in the appropriate provisions of the Act, in the case of offenders below the age of 21 years an injunction is issued to the court not to sentence them to imprisonment unless it is satisfied that having regard to the circumstances of the case; including the nature of the offence and the character of the offenders, it is not desirable to deal with them under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act.”

¶49

Support for this view may be drawn from the decisions of this

¶50

Court in Pathani Parida & another vs. Abhaya Kumar Jagdevmohapatra² and Dhani @ Dhaneswar Sahu vs. State of Orissa³ wherein leniency was shown in similar factual circumstance.

¶51

10. In light of the foregoing discussion, while the conviction of the appellant under Sections 354 of the Indian Penal Code is affirmed, instead of sentencing him to imprisonment, this Court directs that he be released under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, for a period of three months, upon his executing a bond of Rs.5,000/(Rupees Five Thousand) within one month with one surety for the like amount, to appear and receive sentence when called upon during the said period and, in the meantime, to maintain peace and good

¶52

2 2012 (Supp-II) OLR 469

¶53

3 2007 (Supp.II) OLR 250

¶54

Page 9 of 10

¶55

behaviour. The appellant shall remain under the supervision of the concerned Probation Officer during the said period of probation.

¶56

11. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is partly allowed. The conviction of the appellant is maintained; however, the sentence is modified in the manner indicated above.

¶57

12. The Criminal Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

¶58

The High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Dated the 18^th of November, 2025/Subhasis Mohanty

¶59

Signature Not Verified

¶60

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASIS MOHANTY Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 18-Nov-2025 19:35:34

¶61

Page 10 of 10

Kalia @ Mrutunjaya v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalia @ Mrutunjaya v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuna Das Vs State

Sambhu Kumar Vs State

Maheswar Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Prakash Naidu Vs State

Smt.Appala Narasamma Vs State

K.Rajeswar Vs State