The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition concerning a dispute over private land subject to a compromise decree. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to seek an appropriate remedy in the civil courts.
The petition was dismissed; liberty granted to approach the civil court for appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8172 of 2024
Bidulata Rout
…. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Rout, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Orissa & Others
Opposite Parties
Mr. I. Mohanty. ASC CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER
06.04.2024
Order No.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Tudu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 09-Apr-2024 20:19:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition regarding a private land dispute covered by a complied decree.
Bidulata Rout
State of Orissa
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
