The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition filed to seek directions for protecting suit land from interference. The Court held the petition misconceived as it was essentially an attempt to execute an existing civil decree. Relief was refused.
No relief; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 03-May-2024 12:49:28
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). NO.7221 OF 2024 Budhei Naik
…. Petitioner
Mr. Priyaranjan Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Akshaya Kumar Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 02.05.2024
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 03-May-2024 12:49:28
essentially seeks to execute the decree passed in CS No.51 of 2008. Hence, this writ petition is misconceived.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Rojalin
Page 2 of 2
Budhei Naik
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
