Petitioner was absent when the learned counsel for the respondent argued that the writ petition was infructuous due to efflux of time. The Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6811 of 2017
Sukanti Nayak ….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Odisha & ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Behera, ASC
Order No.
02.
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
16.02.2024
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on
call.
3. Mr. A. Behera, learned ASC drawing attention of
this Court to the prayer made in the writ petition
submits, writ petition has become infructuous by
efflux of time.
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Banita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 19-Feb-2024 17:27:58
Page 1 of 1
Sukanti Nayak
State of Odisha
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Banita Priyadarshini Palei
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
