Maa Laxmi Self Help Group v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent on call despite the matter being taken up in hybrid mode.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21363 of 2020
Maa Laxmi Self Help Group …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Behera, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
15.02.2024
Order No.
14. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on
call.
3. Mr. A. Behera, learned Additional Standing
Counsel for the State/Opposite Parties is present.
4. The Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(S. K. Mishra) Judge Kanhu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHAN Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 16-Feb-2024 11:42:29
Maa Laxmi Self Help Group
State of Odisha & others
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court