Dismissed¶17
Uday Nayak v. Md,Rourkela Steel
Orissa HCWP(C)/3943/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Orissa High Court, Cuttack; W.P.(C) No.3943 of 2014; decision dated 07.05.2024; Bench: Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi and Justice G. Satapathy; Petitioner: Uday Nayak (counsel Mr. B. Nayak); Opposite Parties: Managing Director, Rourkela Steel Plant, Rourkela and others (counsel Mr. B.P. Tripathy for OPs.1-3); outcome: writ petition dismissed for want of instruction after petitioner's counsel reported having no instruction; hearing conducted by hybrid mode; no statute cited, no precedent cited, no quantum awarded; suitable only as a record of dismissal for want of instruction, not citable for any substantive proposition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of instruction. ¶17