Writ petition challenging electricity assessment orders and an energy bill was dismissed for non-prosecution as no petitioner representative appeared. Counsel for NESCO noted the provisional order had merged with the final one and an appeal route existed under the Electricity Act. The earlier interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-May-2024 13:14:03
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 32314 OF 2011
Abhaya Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
…. Executive Engineer, Bhadrak South Opp. Party Electrical Division, NESCO, Bhadrak
Mr. S.C. Dash, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 08.05.2024
provisional assessment order dated 10th May, 2010 (Annexure2), final assessment order dated 19th April, 2011 (Annexure-6) and energy bill for the month of July, 2011 (Annexure-7).
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition challenging provisional and final assessment orders and an energy bill proceed despite the petitioner's absence?
Abhaya Kumar Sahoo
Executive Engineer, Bhadrak South Electrical Division, NESCO, Bhadrak
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
