belongs to the Schedule Tribe community and pursuant to the advertisement for oil dealership at Junagarh in the district of Kalahandi, he had applied for the same on 22nd October, 2009 and after scrutiny, was successfully selected for the said outlet and in so far as the opposite party No.6 is concerned, he was one of the applicants and in fact, had lodged a complaint questioning the genuineness of his Caste Certificate. On the basis of such a complaint, as it is further pleaded by the petitioner, opposite party No.2 directed opposite party No.4 to verify the Caste Certificate and furnish a report and after the said direction, Revenue Supervisor submitted the report and then, opposite party No.4 by order dated 12th October, 2010 erroneously reached at a conclusion that he is of ‘Kuli’ caste which is not in the list of ST and hence, the Caste Certificate issued in his favour in Revenue Misc. Case No. 181871 of 2009 was cancelled vide Annexure-1 and it was challenged in W.P.(C) No. 18575 of 2010. It is pleaded that the petitioner filed an appeal before opposite party No.2 and it was referred to opposite party No.1 to take decision thereon. As per the petitioner, the appeal is pending disposal but in the meanwhile, opposite party No.5 issued a letter to him stating therein about the empanelment for the outlet to have been cancelled. The petitioner claims that opposite party No.4 passed the order of cancellation without proper application of judicial mind and at the same time, the appeal is pending before opposite party No.1 since long. It is lastly submitted that the cancellation of the outlet by opposite party No.5 vide Annexure-4 is illegal pending decision in appeal.
