The High Court of Orissa allowed a magistrate's appeal seeking restoration of a dismissed compromise proceeding (CRLMC No.4414 of 2011), condoning the default due to inadvertent non-appearance.
Restoration of CRLMC No.4414 of 2011 to file for disposal
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMA No.19 of 2023
Rama Chandra Jena …. P e titioner Mr. R. Mohanty, A d vocate
-Versus-
Laxmidhar Mish r a …. Opposi t e party. Mr. B.P. Tripat h y, AGA
COR A M: MR. J USTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 09.05.2024
Order No.
P a ge 1 of 2
(R.K.Pattanaik) Judge
Rojina
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 09-May-2024 18:00:31
P a ge 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mutual compromise proceeding dismissed for default can be restored upon the petitioner's explanation of inadvertent absence.
Rama Chandra Jena
Laxmidhar Mishra
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
