Counsel for the petitioner reported no instructions in a writ petition against LIC of India. Taking the memo on record, the High Court disposed of the writ petition without adjudicating any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 13126 of 2009
Avimanyu Das
Petitioner
Mr. J. Sengupta, Advocate Ms. S. Acharya, Advocate
-versus-
…. Chairman, LIC of India and Opposite Parties Others
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
27.02.2024
Order No.
06. 1. Ms. S. Acharya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. J. Sengupta, learned counsel for the Petitioner on record submits “no instruction in the matter”. The memo filed to the said effect is taken on record.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Ayesha
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 28-Feb-2024 15:30:23
Page 1 of 1
Avimanyu Das
Chairman, LIC of India
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
