The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner filed a memo stating that by the efflux of time, the petition no longer remains viable. Consequently, no further proceedings were taken.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12830 of 2010
Surendra Khamurai
Petitioner
Mr. A. Panda, Proxy Counsel
-versus-
State of Orissa & ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. J. Katikia, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No. 06.
ORDER 19.02.2024 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. A. Panda, learned Proxy Counsel, on behalf of Mr. U.R. Jena, learned Counsel for the Petitioner is present and files a memo indicating therein that by efflux of time, the writ petitioner has become infructuous. Memo be kept on record.
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Banita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 20-Feb-2024 18:17:28
Page 1 of 1
Surendra Khamurai
State of Orissa
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
