Petitioners filed a PIL seeking direction to the State for financial support to construct two temples. The High Court held the petition to be totally misconceived based on the pleadings on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 12135 of 2024
Madan Mohan Mahapatra and others
…. Petitioners
None
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. L. Samantray, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
17.05.2024
01.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-May-2024 16:31:06
S. Behera Signature Not Verified
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking direction for financial sanctation sanctions for temple construction is maintainable and correctly pleadable.
Whether the present petition stands conceived as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking financial sanctation sanctions of support for the construction of respective temples.
Whether the present writ petition based on the available pleadings and facts is legally supported.
Madan Mohan Mahapatra and others
State of Odisha
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
