A contempt petition alleging violation of the Court's order. The State stated compliance had been effected and a reasoned order passed; the Court dropped the contempt proceeding, leaving the petitioner free to challenge that order before an appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 2728 of 2024
Banalata Dei
…. Petitioner
Mr. Sarat Chandra Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Siddharth Shankar Swain, I.A.S.
…. Opposite Party Mr. L. Samantaray, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
17.05.2024
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
SK Jena/Secy. Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Cuttack, Cuttac k. Date: 20-May-2024 11:55:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the alleged violation of the Court's earlier order has been complied with, warranting dropping of the contempt proceeding.
Banalata Dei
Siddharth Shankar Swain, I.A.S.
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
