Haladhar Rout v. Govinda Prasad Sharm
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel stated there was no instruction from the appellant to pursue the appeal further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SA No.61 of 1992
Haladhar Rout
..... Appellant(s)
Represented By Mr.A.Mishra,Advocate On behalf of
Mr.G.Mukherji,Sr.Advocate
-versus-
Govinda Prasad Sharma & Others
..... Respondent(s)
Represented By None
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
ORDER
Order No. 09.12.2024
Signature Not Verified
( A.C. Behera ) Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: BINAYAK SAHOOBinayak Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 09-Dec-2024 14:51:41
Page 1 of 1
Haladhar Rout
Govinda Prasad Sharma
Others
Ananda Chandra Behera
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court