Bidhan Ch.Pradhan v. Juria Sahoo andORTHERS
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel reported no instructions from the appellants to pursue the matter further; the appeal was disposed of finally.
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel reported no instructions from the appellants to pursue the matter further; the appeal was disposed of finally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SA No.2 of 1991
Bidhan Chandra Pradhan (dead)
.....
Appellant(s)
& Others
Represented By Mr.A.Mishra,Advocate On behalf of Mr.G.Mukherji,Sr.Advocate
-versus-
Juria Sahoo (dead) & Others
..... Respondent(s)
Represented By None
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
ORDER
Order No. 09.12.2024
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: BINAYAK SAHOO Reason: AuthenticationBinayak Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 09-Dec-2024 14:51:41
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should proceed given the appellants' lack of instructions to prosecute.
Bidhan Chandra Pradhan (dead) & Others
Juria Sahoo (dead) & Others
Ananda Chandra Behera
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court