The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous on the ground that the relief sought, specifically the registration of an FIR against the petitioner, had already been granted by the investigating agency.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous since the FIR had already been registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.581 of 2024
Mahesh Kumar Mallick
…. Petitioner
Mr. B.K. Parida-2, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and …. Opposite others Parties
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, SC
CORAM:
Order No.
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER(ORAL) 09.07.2024
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Signature Not Verified Priyajit
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYAJIT SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORI SSA Date: 10-Jul-2024 16:36:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal miscellaneous petition maturing in discharge of an applicant against a petition marked refuse standing disposed off as infructuous.
Mahesh Kumar Mallick
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
