Petitioner sought directions to authorities under the senior citizens protection scheme, the Maintenance and Welfare of Senior Citizen Act, 2007 and State Rules for non-action on his representation. Court directed that a fresh representation be entertained with personal hearing and orders passed per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 483 of 2023
K. Dilli Rao Achari
…. Petitioner Mr. S. B. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
09.01.2024
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
appropriate order in accordance with law commensurating the Scheme, Acts & Rules mentioned above, if the grievance covers the same allowing a personal hearing to the Petitioner before disposal of the representation.
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
AKPradhan
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANANTA KUMAR PRADHAN Designation: Sr. Steno Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 11-Jan-2024 18:59:13
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Collector, Ganjam must entertain a fresh representation on protection of senior citizens' life and property under the Scheme, Act and Rules.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Dilli Rao Achari
State of Odisha and Others
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
