In a quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging proceedings in Bargarh, the court refused to entertain the prayer to quash. However, liberty was granted to the petitioner to challenge the framing of charge by filing a discharge petition.
Prayer to quash proceedings dismissed; liberty granted to file petition for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.100 of 2024
Pintu Meher
.....
Petitioner
Represented By Adv. – Mr. Abhaya Kumar Parida
-versus-
1) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Party 2) Smiti Behera Represented By Adv. – Mr. Debasish Nayak, A.G.A.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER
24.07.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 1.
the points at the time of framing of charge by filing a petition of discharge.
( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra) Judge
Debasis
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 29-Jul-2024 20:14:48
Page 2 of 2.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the criminal proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in the interests of justice.
Whether the Petitioner should be allowed liberty to raise points at the time of framing of charge via a discharge petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pintu Meher
State Of Odisha
Smiti Behera
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
