A contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a 2015 writ order. As the contemnor had invited the petitioner for discussion, the petitioner was directed to meet him on a fixed date for disposal of his representation, and the contempt case was dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.388 of 2017
Ashamanjari Mohapatra …. Petitioner
Represented By Adv.
Mr. L. Dash
-versus-
G.Mathi Vathanan
…. Opposite Party/ Contemnor
Represented By ASC Mr. I. Mohanty
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order
21.05.2024
No.
1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2 . The Petitioner has filed this CONTC for noncompliance of the order dated 09.10.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.17407 of 2015.
3 . Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
4 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Opposite Party/Contemnor has already invited for discussion.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
5. Since the Opposite Party/Contemnor has already invited for discussion, the Petitioner is directed to meet and approach the Opposite Party/Contemnor positively on 13th June, 2024 in between 10 am to 1 pm. In such event, the Opposite Party/Contemnor shall dispose of the representation of the present Petitioner.
6 . Accordingly, the CONTC is dropped.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
Sumitra
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMITRA NAYAK Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 21-May-2024 15:51:58
Page 2 of 2
Ashamanjari Mohapatra
G.Mathi Vathanan
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
