Petitioner's application for modification of a previous order was found not maintainable but permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application per incuriam. Matter listed for the next hearing.
The I.A. permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application for redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9375 of 2024
Laxminarayan Mohanty …. Petitioner Mr. Pitambar Behera, Adv.
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & Others Opposite Parties Mr. Sonak Mishra, ASC Mr. Devasis Panda, Sr. Advocate for O.P. No.5
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order 15.01.2025 No. I.A. No.9681 of 2024
2. In filing this I.A, the Petitioner has sought for modification of the order dated 20.05.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 9375 of 2024.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.
4. Looking to the order dated 20.05.2024 and hearing the submissions made on behalf of all the parties, this Court finds that the prayer made in this I.A. is not maintainable. However, considering the further submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court permits learned counsel for the Petitioner to withdraw this I.A. with liberty
Page 1 of 2
to file an appropriate application for redressal of his grievance.
5. The I.A is accordingly disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.9375 of 2024
6. List this matter on 10.02.2025.
Judge
Gitanjali
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: P.A. Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 16-Jan-2025 19:11:13
Page 2 of 2
Laxminarayan Mohanty
State of Odisha
S.K. PANIGRAHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
