Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a court order. The Additional Government Advocate stated compliance was effected and filed an affidavit. The contempt proceeding was dropped, with liberty to challenge the compliance decision before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.350 of 2024
Karnaraj Barik …. Petitioner
Mr. Brundaban Rout, Advocate
-versus-
…. Ashok Kumar Dehury, Tahasildar, Opposite Party / Kanika Contemnors Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 13.05.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 14-May-2024 11:51:56
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Aswini/Laxmikant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the alleged violation of the Court's order has been remedied so that the contempt proceeding may be dropped.
Karnaraj Barik
Ashok Kumar Dehury, Tahasildar
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
