In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order, the petitioner admitted compliance. The High Court dropped the contempt proceedings accordingly.
Contempt proceeding stood dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.320 of 2022
Dharanidhar Nanda …. Petitioner
Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Director General, Archaeological Survey …. Opposite Parties / of India (ASI), New Delhi and others Contemnors
Mr. L. Samantaray, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No. 03.
ORDER 09.05.2024
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
MRS/Laxmikant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 11-May-2024 13:06:46
Dharanidhar Nanda
Director General, Archaeological Survey of India
Murahari Sri Raman
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
