The Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging disobedience of a Division Bench order, noting that the contemnors had approached the Supreme Court against the impugned order. No case of deliberate disobedience was made out given the pending appeal.
Dispersed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again at appropriate time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1918 of 2024
Priyabata Garanayak …. Petitioner
Mr. Dillip Ray, Advocate
-versus-
Dr. Anu Garg, IAS and others
…. Opposite Parties/Contemnors
Mr. Lalatendu Samantray, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No. 02.
ORDER 06.05.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
Page 1 of 2
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
MRS/Laxmikant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 07-May-2024 13:53:15
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was deliberate disobedience of the Court's order dated 25.09.2023.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha & others Vrs. Bindusagar SamantrayReferred
State of Odisha & others Vrs. Bindusagar Samantray
Priyabata Garanayak
Dr. Anu Garg, IAS and others
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
