State of Odisha v. Jitendra Kumar Satpathy
Case brief
What is this about?
The State of Odisha submitted that the appeal had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The High Court disposed of the appeal on that basis without addressing merits.
The State of Odisha submitted that the appeal had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The High Court disposed of the appeal on that basis without addressing merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTAC No. 1 of 2021
State of Odisha and others
…. Appellants
Mr. L. Samantray, Additional Government Advocate
-versus-
…. Jitendra Kumar Satpathy Respondent Mr. L. Bhuyan, Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
06.05.2024
02. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
S. Behera
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 07-May-2024 15:25:11
State of Odisha and others
Jitendra Kumar Satpathy
Murahari Sri Raman
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
M.S. Raman
S. Behera
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court