Allowed

Sanjit Beck @ Sanjib @ Behera v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC12 Dec 2024BLAPL/9695/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa allowed the bail application of the petitioners charged with snatching a mobile phone and cash. Bail was granted on providing bonds with sureties and adhering to specific conditions regarding attendance and reporting. The quashing of bail could be exercised if conditions are violated.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners admitted to bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.50,000 each with two solvent sureties for like amount.

Sanjit Beck @ Sanjib @ Behera Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.9695 of 2024

¶2

Sanjit Beck @ Sanjib @ … Behera and others

¶3

Petitioners

¶4

Mr. S.R. Das, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

… Opposite Party Mr. A. Pradhan, APP

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

¶9

Order No.

¶10

02.

¶11

ORDER(ORAL) 12.12.2024

¶12

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

¶13

This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Kutra PS Case No.152 of 2023 corresponding to GR Case No.770 of 2023 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Rajgangpur, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 394 of IPC r/w Sections 25/27 of Arms Act, on the allegation of snatching away one mobile phone and cash of Rs.10,000/- from the Informant. 3. Heard, Mr. Soumya Ranjan Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A. Pradhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the present matter and perused the record.

¶14

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioners in custody since 22.04.2024 with submission of charge-sheet in the meanwhile and FIR being registered against unknown persons and taking into account the release of co-accused Bijay Xalxo on bail in BLAPL No.8751 of 2024 and keeping in view the wellrecognized principle of “bail is the rule, but jail is the exception”, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, admits the petitioners to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioners stands allowed and the petitioners are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

¶17

(i) the petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail,

¶18

(ii) the petitioners in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless their attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioners fail without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioners for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law,

¶19

(iii) the petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior

¶20

Page 2 of 3

¶21

permission till disposal of the case by giving their present address of stay and

¶22

(iv) the petitioners shall report attendance before the jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on 2^nd Sunday of each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of their release from the custody.

¶23

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioners unnecessarily after recording their attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

¶24

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioners in future for similar/grave offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case.

¶25

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per

¶26

Rules.

¶27

(G. Satapathy) Judge

¶28

Subhasmita

¶29

Signature Not Verified

¶30

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 13-Dec-2024 12:03:01

¶31

Page 3 of 3

Sanjit Beck @ Sanjib @ Behera v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjit Beck @ Sanjib @ Behera v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somanath Das Vs State of Odisha

Ashok Giri Vs State of Odisha

Ashok Kumar Pati Vs State of Odisha

Ganesh @ Dillip Rout Vs State of Odisha

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Chhotan Shil Vs State of Odisha