Allowed

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC12 Dec 2024BLAPL/10933/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an assault case involving offences under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109(1)/3(5) BNS. Considering parity with co-accused already released on bail and the nature of injuries, the court granted bail with conditions including periodic police-station attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety, subject to stated conditions; BLAPL disposed of.

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.10933 of 2024

¶2

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Mr. L. Mishra, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

… Opposite Party

¶8

Mr. A. Pradhan, APP Mr. B.B. Rout, Advocate (Informant)

¶9

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

¶10

Order No.

¶11

02.

¶12

ORDER(ORAL) 12.12.2024

¶13

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

¶14

This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bharatpur PS Case No.641 of 2024 corresponding to CT Case No.1715 of 2024 pending in the file of learned JMFC-V, Bhubaneswar, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 118(1)/ 109(1)/ 3(5) of BNS, on the allegation of assaulting the son of the informant and causing injury to him. 3. Heard, Mr. Lalitendu Mishra, learned counsel who enters appearance for the petitioner by filing appearance memo in Court today, which is taken on record, Mr. Bibhuti Bhusan Rout, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. A. Pradhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the present matter and perused the record.

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the materials placed on record keeping in view the release of co-accused Biswas Nayak @ Biswasha Bhusan Nayak on bail in obedience to the order passed by this Court in ABLAPL No.11334 of 2024, so also co-accused Nihar Jena and Soubhagya Ranjan Sundaray Raja in BLAPL Nos.11571 and 11715 of 2024 and taking into account the nature of injuries suffered by the injured, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits admits the petitioner to bail, notwithstanding to the serious objection as raised by the learned counsel for the informant.

¶17

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

¶18

(i) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

¶19

(ii) the petitioner in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned

¶20

Page 2 of 3

¶21

trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law,

¶22

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case by giving his present address of stay and

¶23

(iv) the petitioner shall report attendance before the jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on 2^nd Sunday of each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for three(03) months from the actual date of his release from the custody.

¶24

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

¶25

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioner in future for similar/grave offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case.

¶26

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

(G. Satapathy) Judge

¶29

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Subhasmita Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 13-Dec-2024 12:03:02

¶30

Page 3 of 3

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somanath Das Vs State of Odisha

Ashok Giri Vs State of Odisha

Ashok Kumar Pati Vs State of Odisha

Ganesh @ Dillip Rout Vs State of Odisha

Sanjit Beck @ Sanjib @ Behera Vs State of Odisha

Chhotan Shil Vs State of Odisha