The petitioner sought bail in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity of brown sugar. The court refused bail, holding that available materials did not show the petitioner's innocence and the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applied.
Bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7702 of 2024
Chitta Ranjan Sahoo @ Madhu
..... Petitioner
Represented By Adv. - Ajaya Kumar Pradhan
-versus-
State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Party
Represented By Adv. –
B.K. Sahu, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
ORDER
27.11.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 2.
illegal/unauthorized possession of 1Kg 100 gms of brown sugar, which is commercial quantity.
Signature Not Verified Utkalika
(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 27-Nov-2024 17:49:14
Page 2 of 2.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in light of the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Chitta Ranjan Sahoo @ Madhu
State Of Odisha
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
