Disposed

Rama Nag v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC3 Oct 2024BLAPL/6642/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused in a POCSO case sought regular bail after rejection by the Special Judge; final form had been filed and he was in custody. The High Court granted bail subject to conditions including fortnightly police-station appearances and no intimidation of the informant.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on terms fixed by the trial court, with conditions of fortnightly police appearance and non-intimidation.

Rama Nag Vs State of Odisha — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.6642 of 2024

¶3

Rama Nag

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr. S.K. Joshi, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha

¶8

…. Opposite Party

¶9

Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER

03.10.2024

Order No.

03.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶15

The Petitioner is an accused in connection with Special G.R No.41 of 2024 pending on the file of learned Addl. District-Judge-Cum-Special Judge(POCSO) arising out of Balpada P.S. Case No.0105 of 2024 for commission of offence alleged under Sections 363/376(2)(n)/506 of IPC read with section 6 of the POCSO Act.

¶16

Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court.

¶17

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned

¶18

Page 1 of 3

¶19

A.D.J.-cum-Special Judge-under POCSO Act, Balangir by order dated 19.06.2024 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

¶20

It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2024 and as final form has already been filed on 10.06.2024, he may be released on bail.

¶21

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 7. Perused the 164 Cr.P.C statement of the victim.

¶22

Considering the same, this Court directs the Petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin. 9. It is further directed that the Petitioner shall not in any way try to intimidate the informant and his family.

¶23

It shall be open for the informant/prosecution to seek variance of this order in the event there is any threat perception.

¶24

Additionally, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdiction police station once every fortnight on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin till the conclusion of trial. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the Court in seisin.

¶25

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

¶28

(V. NARASINGH) Judge

¶29

SOUMYA

¶30

Signature Not Verified

¶31

Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 04-Oct-2024 11:03:10

¶32

Page 3 of 3

Rama Nag v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rama Nag v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukta @ Mukuta @ Prakash Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Digambra Majhi Vs State of Odisha

Sashikanta Mankar Vs State of Odisha

Dharmendra Kumar Balmik Vs State of Odisha

Patitapaban Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Birendra Mahananda Vs State of Odisha