Allowed

Bidyadhar Pradhan@Elo v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC13 Nov 2024BLAPL/6190/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application by the petitioner, under Section 439 Cr.P.C., arising from allegations of manufacturing a pistol, attempting to murder police personnel, and using explosives was disposed of. The High Court allowed the bail after hearing counsel, imposing stringent conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on furnishing a bond of Rs.50,000 with two solvent sureties for Rs.50,000 each, subject to stringent conditions including non-interference with witnesses and immediate trial attendance.

Bidyadhar Pradhan@Elo Vs State of Odisha — Corruption | Orissa HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL NO.6190 OF 2024

¶2

Bidyadhar Pradhan @ Elo

¶3

Petitioner

¶4

Represented By Adv.

¶5

-Mr. Sarada Prasad Dash.

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha

¶8

…. Opposite Parties, Represented By Adv. -Mr.Tapas Ku. Acharya, ASC. CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA

ORDER

Order No.

13.11.2024

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (Virtual/ Physical) mode.

¶14

This bail application under section 439 of Cr.P.C., 1973 of the Petitioner arising out of G.R. Case No.407 of 2024 in connection with Jamankira P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 is taken up for consideration.

¶15

I have already heard from the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

¶16

The Petitioner has been charge-sheeted under Section341/353/307 read with 34 of I.P.C and Section- 25 & 27 Arms Act along with Section-9B(1)(a) of the Indian Explosive Act on the allegations of manufacturing country made pistol and attempting to commit murder of police personnels during the course of their chasing to the Petitioner.

¶17

When the investigation of the case has already been completed and when the Petitioner is in custody for about more than 6 months, then by taking the above factors into account, it is

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

felt proper to allow the Petitioner to go on bail with the stringent conditions.

¶20

Therefore, the bail application filed by the Petitioner is allowed.

¶21

He (Petitioner) is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kuchinda with conditions that:-

¶22

(i) he (Petitioner) shall not involve with similar nature of crime in future.

¶23

(ii) he (Petitioner) shall remain present on each date of adjournment of the trial Court till its conclusion. (iii) he (Petitioner) shall not terrorize, coerce, influence or threat any witnesses of the prosecution including the informant and his family members either directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever at any stage of the trial of the case, but, in case of his failure to comply any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned trial Court is authorized to cancel his bail order outrightly without seeking any permission for the same from this Court.

¶24

Accordingly, the bail application of the Petitioner is disposed of finally.

¶25

Grant certified copy of this order to the Petitioner on proper application.

¶26

Signature Not Verified

¶27

Digitally Signed Signed by: NARAYAN HO Narayan Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 14-Nov-2024 10:49:15

¶28

(A.C. Behera), Judge.

¶29

Page 2 of 2

Bidyadhar Pradhan@Elo v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bidyadhar Pradhan@Elo v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Vs Santwant Singh

Chandrakanti Nahak Vs State of Odisha

Sk. Sajid Ali @ Ramjano Vs State of Odisha

Bibhisan Gond@Bhibasana Gond Vs State of Odisha

Dhaneswar Barik Vs State of Odisha

Subrat Das @ Babu @ Nuna Vs State of Odisha