The court noted that the victim in a POCSO matter was not informed of the bail application as mandated by the rules. The court directed the petitioner's counsel to serve an extra copy of the bail application to the AGA for transmission to the police station for service upon the informant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.1770 of 2024
Kishore Chandra Sethi @ … Petitioner Kalia
Mr. P.K. Beura, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
… Opposite Party
Mr. P.K. Muduli, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER(ORAL) 15.05.2024
Order No.
01.
Page 1 of 2
(G. Satapathy) Judge
kishore
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KISHORE KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-May-2024 19:13:42
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the victim in the case was informed of the bail proceedings as required under Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishore Chandra Sethi
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
