The High Court rejected the petitioner's bail application in an NDPS case, relying on the rigors of Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act and previous rejections of bail by this Court and the Sessions Judge. Liberty was granted to renew the prayer at a later stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 1084 of 2024
Md. Pyare …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 18.03.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 3
Petitioner vide order dated 20.07.2023 during the currency of investigation and taking into account the contraband(Heroin) seized to the tune of 258 grams 030mg. Thereafter, post charge sheet the Petitioner moved this Court in BLAPL No.10876 of 2023, which was rejected by order dated 11.10.2023.
Page 2 of 3
(V. NARASINGH)
Soumya Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 20-Mar-2024 12:31:04
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in an NDPS case under Sections 21(C)/25/29 given the statutory bar under Section 37 and no change in circumstances.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State by the Inspector of Police v. B. RamuRelied on¶8
State by the Inspector of Police vs. B. Ramu in SLP(Crl.) No(s).8137 of 2022 dated 12.02.2024
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Md. Pyare
State of Odisha
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
