The High Court of Orissa noted that the appellant's counsel declined to press the application during hearing. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as not pressed. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.5203 of 2022
Ganesh Mahalik
.....
Petitioner
Represented By Adv. - Vivekananda Jena
-versus-
State Of Odisha
..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – P. K. Mohanty. ASC
M/s. Swadha Rath Adv. for Informant
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
17.05.2024
Order No.
In view of above, the ABLAPL stands dismissed as not pressed.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Gitanjali Date: 21-May-2024 16:34:34
Page 1 of 1.
Ganesh Mahalik
State Of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
