The High Court allowed bail to the appellants in a caste atrocities case, setting aside the impugned order, on the view that further detention serves no useful purpose.
Bail granted to the appellants with conditions for personal appearance and weekly reporting to IIC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLA No.153 of 2024
1) Jitun @ Asish Mahala ..... Appellants 2) Alia@subash Kumar Mahala Represented By Adv. - Ramani Kanta Pattanaik
-versus-
1) State Of Odisha ..... Respondents 2) Seshadev Mallik Represented By Adv. – S. K. Nayak, AGA
M/s Amulya Ratna Panda, Satyabrata Dash, Adv. for Informant
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
16.05.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 2.
Issue urgent certifiesd copy as per rules.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Gitanjali Location: OHC Date: 21-May-2024 16:32:22
Page 2 of 2.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further detention of the appellants till conclusion of the trial serves any useful purpose?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Jitun @ Asish Mahala
Alia@subash Kumar Mahala
State Of Odisha
Seshadev Mallik
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
