Umakanta Nayak v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPCRL No. 55 of 2023
Umakanta Nayak
..……. Petitioner
Versus
State of Orissa & Others
..…….. Opposite Parties Ms. S. Pattnaik, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
21.06.2023
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Ms. S. Patnaik, learned Additional Government Advocate on filing the status report dated 02.06.2023 has stated that the victim and her minor son have been rescued. The petitioner, the victim and her minor son are reunited.
3. Mr. P. Panda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made a statement in the court that the accused who kidnapped the victim and her son had taken away her gold ornaments.
4. The victim or the petitioner shall be at liberty to inform the Police regarding taking away of her gold jewelleries and pledging those jewelleries for taking loan.
5. In view of the above development, the proceeding stands closed.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANCE Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 21-Jun-2023 17:36:19
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
puspa
Page 1 of 1
Umakanta Nayak
State of Orissa
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court