A writ petition regarding the custody of a victim girl was closed as infructuous following the petitioner's report that the victim was recovered by police and restored to the petitioner's custody.
The petition was closed as infructuous. The State Advocate was directed to inform the Investigating Officer to record the victim's statement if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPCRL No. 37 of 2023
Sibanarayan Sethi
….. Petitioner
Mr. P. Panda, Adv.
Vs.
….. State of Orissa & Others Opp. Parties Mr. S. Patnaik, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
10.04.2023
Order No.
the State has no information, but in view of the development stated by the Petitioner, this Petition stands closed as infructuous.
inform the Investigating Officer to take steps for recording the statement of the victim girl within a short time, if the Investigating Officer finds it necessary.
Page 1 of 2
Addl. Govt. Advocate.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(S.Talapatra) Judge
Sukanta
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Sibanarayan Sethi
State of Orissa
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
