Basant Kumar Sahoo v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite a revised call during a hybrid hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) (OA) No.2294 of 2014
Basant Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Rath, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No. 20.12.2023
09. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. None appeared for the Petitioner in spite of revised
call.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for
non-prosecution.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CU TTACK Date: 22-Dec-2023 16:53:24
Basant Kumar Sahoo
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court