Petitioner sought directions to halt a tender process and allow completion of remaining work on a bus stand project. Since the respondent authority revoked the contract rescission and permitted work to proceed post-filing, no adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P (C) No. 9665 of 2023
Ankush Prasad Hota
….. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dash, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
10.08.2023
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
be revoked by the competent authority.
Ashok
Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR JAGADEB MOHAPATRA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 10-Aug-2023 16:53:51
Page 2 of 2
Ankush Prasad Hota
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
